On Tuesday, I stopped at a local hardware store to buy a new light bulb  for our outdoor motion lights above our garage doors. The fixture has  two bulbs, but only one has been lit. I figure I’m saving energy if we  don’t have to keep both lighted.
I picked out a General Electric LED flood lights  with a spiral interior that uses 26 watts and cost about $7. It’s  guaranteed to last six years. It has an Energy Star rating and  supposedly will save $64 over its lifetime compared to using four  90-watt Halogen bulbs.
OK, but it contains mercury, and the package listed a website for  details about proper disposal. Besides, it doesn’t give off much light,  though it supposedly turns brighter after a brief warm-up. Typically,  the floodlight is only on a short time. I might have to buy a second  bulb for the other socket. I’d still be further ahead, however, than  paying the energy costs for two traditional bulbs.
Later Tuesday I read an Associated Press story about a new “amazing”  light bulb. It will go on sale Sunday, Earth Day, at Home Depot and  other outlets. The bulb won a $10 million government contest.
The cost of components, including chips,LED panel light  or diodes, that give off the light makes it pricey. Commercial  customers will pay $60, but the maker, Philips, will discount it to $50  for consumers. Philips also is working on deals with utilities to  discount it further, by as much as $20 or $30, the story said.
This LED bulb uses just 10  watts, meaning it saves about $8 per year in electricity if it’s used  four hours per day, the story said. It’s expected to last 20 years—or 30  times longer than an incandescent.
 
没有评论:
发表评论